JR ENGINEERING COMPANY has engaged John Jairo Ramírez, M.Sc., P.E., an experienced civil engineer, to develop the best business case to address the challenges in the Capital Facilities Information Handover Process. He specializes in product and project portfolio management in the infrastructure and oil/gas sectors, driving digitalization and optimization across the asset lifecycle.
At JR ENGINEERING COMPANY, we are pleased to present our solution tailored to address Frontera Energy's unique challenges in the Capital Facilities Information Handover Process. Our proposal focuses on improving the performance of Capital Facilities projects, minimizing rework, and ensuring that asset information handover meets the needs of your stakeholders. Documentation is a valuable asset, and like all assets, it has a lifecycle. Therefore, any necessary revisions can be costly at every stage of the project.
In this microsite, we will explore our strategy in detail, the benefits it can offer, and how we can collaborate to achieve your goals. Let's begin by providing some context!
💡Most organizations spend hours of rework due to poor data integrity from handovers. A common language increases data integrity, which reduces the number of times each employee needs to revisit the information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Problem
Rework due to documentation issues is a significant challenge in capital facilities projects, leading to costly delays, inefficiencies, and quality concerns.
Problem Dimension and Impact
Inadequate or inaccurate documentation can manifest in various ways, from ambiguous requirements and incomplete design documentation to insufficient manufacturing/construction plans, improper test plans, components over/under specifications, and outdated operational manuals. This can result in errors, misunderstandings, and the need to revisit and redo work at different stages of the product lifecycle, ultimately impacting project timelines, budgets, and customer satisfaction.
Hypothesis
By implementing a comprehensive approach based on engineering requirements and systems engineering principles, organizations can minimize the risk of rework caused by documentation issues and ensure the delivery of high-quality products that meet customer expectations.
Solution Proposal
Our company has developed a systematic approach to address documentation issues and minimize rework:
Gather the business requirements:
Do a baseline:
Do a gap analysis:
Develop improvement measures:
Implement improvement measures:
Evaluate:
Go to start:
How Our Company Could Do This
Our company is well-positioned to implement this approach due to our expertise in systems engineering and our commitment to continuous improvement. By leveraging the Systems Engineering Concept®, our experienced cross-functional teams, and our collaborative culture, we can effectively address documentation issues and minimize rework throughout the product lifecycle.
Open Questions
While this approach provides a solid framework, there may be organization-specific challenges or considerations that need to be addressed. Some open questions to explore include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
💡 By addressing these open questions and continuously refining our approach, we can further enhance our ability to minimize rework and deliver high-quality products that meet or exceed stakeholders expectations.
Data Integrity
Most organizations spend hours of rework due to poor data integrity from handovers. A common language increases data integrity, which reduces the number of times each employee needs to revisit the information.
Cost to extrat defects
Extracting defects are very costly, especially if discovered late in the project phase. Based on your project budget and warranty obligations, you can calculate the potential savings by implementing the SEC.
System integration
Based on our experience 8-22% of all potential interfaces are actual interfaces that need to be fully controlled in order to avoid costly errors. Calculate your potential savings by being 100% in control of all interfaces in your system design!
A1. The old label system and RDS can coexist by mapping software between the old label and the RDS label.
A2. More information and updates about the standard series can be found at http://81346.com/
A3. It supports the entire lifecycle of a facility, from conception to end of life, and supports operation and improves the information desired for operation. We can display design requirements, product information, and operation information for the same object.
A4. 1) Project or maintenance areas within the company may be suitable to start with. 2) Start small, learn, gather experience, and expand. 3) Learn from others, avoiding making the same mistakes.
A5. It is applicable for both existing and new facilities, much like we introduced 3D CAD in our industry. The proposition is to use it where there is a positive business case.
A6. This is done to advance digitalization, to be able to digitize requirements, to support an artificial intelligent digital twin, to establish a common language within the oil and gas industry, to leverage operator proprietary specifications to a cross-industrial standard, and to allow connecting a large ecosystem with other industries and more.
A7. Requirements engineering is the overall process of developing and verifying system requirements, while requirements management is a focused discipline within it that deals with organizing, connecting, and controlling requirements changes and traceability.
A8. Proper requirements management improves communication with stakeholders, reduces defects and rework, ensures better product outcomes, and facilitates easier verification and validation of requirements.
A9. RMS tools enable collaboration, version control, traceability, impact analysis, document management, and establish relationships between requirements for better organization and control.
A10. Traceability links requirements to other artifacts like design elements, test cases, etc. This helps in impact analysis of requirement changes and ensures complete coverage during verification and validation.
A11. Validation ensures that the specified requirements meet the stakeholder needs, while verification checks if the system/product meets the specified requirements.
A12. Analyzing requirements quality helps identify defects, ambiguities, inconsistencies, etc. early on, reducing rework and costs associated with addressing issues later.
A13. Authoring tools assist in consistently capturing and structuring requirements using templates, terminology management, collaborative editing, etc. for better quality and maintainability.
A14. Prioritizing requirements helps focus efforts, while change management governs how requirement changes are proposed, analyzed for impact, approved, and implemented in a controlled manner.
Guadalupe Street, Austin, TX, USA
Usamos cookies para analizar el tráfico del sitio web y optimizar tu experiencia en el sitio. Al aceptar nuestro uso de cookies, tus datos se agruparán con los datos de todos los demás usuarios.